Public Trust In The Conduct Of The 2024 Elections In Southeast Sulawesi

Main Article Content

andi awaluddin maruf
Jamaluddin Hos

Abstract

Public trust is a fundamental element in the legitimacy of conducting democratic elections. The 2024 General Election in Southeast Sulawesi faces challenges in maintaining public confidence regarding the principles of being direct, general, free, secret, honest, and fair (*Luber* and *Jurdil*). This study aims to analyze the level of public trust in the conduct of the 2024 General Election in Southeast Sulawesi and to identify the factors influencing such trust. The research employs a quantitative approach through a survey method, utilizing a multi-stage random sampling technique with 400 respondents distributed across all regencies/cities in Southeast Sulawesi. The margin of error for the study is 5%. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The findings indicate that 51.2% of the population in Southeast Sulawesi still believe that the 2024 General Election will be conducted in accordance with the *Luber* and *Jurdil* principles, while 48.8% express low or no confidence. This nearly balanced level of public trust reflects a serious challenge to the legitimacy of the election, necessitating systematic efforts to enhance the transparency, accountability, and professionalism of election organizers.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

Anderson, C. J., & Tverdova, Y. V. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 91-109.

Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (2016). Electoral dynamics in Indonesia: Money politics, patronage and clientelism at the grassroots. Singapore: NUS Press.

Birch, S. (2008). Electoral institutions and popular confidence in electoral processes: A cross-national analysis. Electoral Studies, 27(2), 305-320.

Budiardjo, M. (2008). Dasar-dasar ilmu politik. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust and economic development. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 12-25.

Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

James, T. S. (2020). Comparative electoral management and institutional confidence. Electoral Studies, 63, 102-115.

Maknung, M. A., & Ma'ruf, A. A. (2022). Partisipasi politik masyarakat dalam pemilihan kepala daerah (PILKADA) Konawe Utara tahun 2020. Parabela: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan & Politik Lokal, 2(1), 34-43.

Muhtadi, B. (2019). Vote buying in Indonesia: The mechanics of electoral bribery. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.

Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Norris, P. (2014). Why electoral integrity matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Rose, R., & Mishler, W. (2002). Comparing regime support in non-democratic and democratic countries. Democratization, 9(2), 1-20.

Suharizal. (2012). Pemilukada: Regulasi, dinamika, dan konsep mendatang. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weatherford, M. S. (1992). Measuring political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 86(1), 149-166.

Zmerli, S., & Hooghe, M. (2011). Political trust: Why context matters. Colchester: ECPR Press.